Saturday, October 17, 2026 · Edition updated 6:00 AM ETSAT, OCT 17 · 6 AM ET editionNext edition in Next --:--:--

Computer tool for lifestyle advice to workers did not perform well enough

A study · Work (Reading, Mass.) · Oct 13, 2026

What this means

Researchers tried to build a computer tool that suggests lifestyle changes to help workers stay employed. Most versions did not work well enough to use.

Plain-English summary written by an AI model from the abstract. The original is below.

Tested inPeople
Who it was tested in
3412 paired health check-ups of workers from a population group, 2010-2020
Kind of research
A study

The science

Original title
Application of machine learning for personalized advice about workers' lifestyle changes to improve sustainable employability: Development and evaluation of a decision support tool.
Authors
Six Dijkstra MW, Soer R, Salomons EL et al.
Journal
Work (Reading, Mass.)
Published
Oct 13, 2026
Study type
Study

Abstract

BackgroundOccupational Health Check-ups (OHCs) have evolved from identifying work-related health risks to supporting sustainable employability through individualized lifestyle advice, but translating multidimensional demographic, occupational, and health characteristics into effective, personalized recommendations remains complex and lacks validated decision-support methods.ObjectiveAims of this study are to: 1) develop a Machine Learning Decision Support Tool (ML-DST) based on workers' demographic, occupational, and health characteristics to support personalized advice about lifestyle changes to improve sustainable employability, and 2) evaluate performance of the ML-DST.MethodsReal-world OHC data from a population-based cohort (2010-2020) were used to develop ML-DST models providing lifestyle advice (physical activity, smoking, alcohol, nutrition, relaxation, or no change) to improve workability and vitality. Paired baseline and 1-4-year follow-up data were used to train and evaluate 12 models. Per model, three rule-based algorithms were applied. Performance was considered useful when both True Positive Rate (TPR) and macroF1 score were ≥0.7. The best performing algorithm is proposed per model for inclusion in the final ML-DST.ResultsOf 20,440 individual OHCs, 3412 paired sets were included. Best TPRs ranged from 0.51 to 0.71. One model achieved TPR and macroF1 scores ≥0.7, supporting nutritional behavior change to improve vitality; however, its profiles were not conceptually meaningful. The other 11 models did not achieve useful quantitative performance.ConclusionTraining algorithms for an ML-DST to support advice about lifestyle changes to improve long-term sustainable employability using data from regular Occupational Health Check-ups did not lead to useful model performance for improving workability and vitality.

Read it on PubMed ↗

Six Dijkstra MW, Soer R, Salomons EL et al. Application of machine learning for personalized advice about workers' lifestyle changes to improve sustainable employability: Development and evaluation of a decision support tool. Work (Reading, Mass.). 2026. doi:10.1177/10519815261490878. PMID: 42867901. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42867901/

Report a problem