Saturday, October 17, 2026 · Edition updated 6:00 AM ETSAT, OCT 17 · 6 AM ET editionNext edition in Next --:--:--

Researchers compared five protein-measuring methods to find new aging genes in worms

A study · Proteomics · Oct 15, 2026

What this means

Scientists measured proteins in worms with a longer-lived gene change. They then tested some proteins to find new factors affecting lifespan. This shows possible links to longevity, but it is early work in worms.

Plain-English summary written by an AI model from the abstract. The original is below.

Tested inAnimals
Who it was tested in
C. elegans worms
Kind of research
A study

The science

Original title
Comparative Proteomic Quantification Reveals Novel Longevity Regulators.
Authors
Ding L, Lin H, Huang C et al.
Journal
Proteomics
Published
Oct 15, 2026
Study type
Study

Abstract

Proteomics is a powerful tool for profiling the protein landscape underlying cellular and physiological processes. Advances in mass spectrometry-based methods, such as tandem mass tags (TMT) isobaric labeling-based proteomics at both MS2 and MS3, label-free quantification (LFQ) with data-dependent acquisition (DDA) or data-independent acquisition (DIA)-based proteomics, and stable isotope labeling with amino acid (SILAC) spike-in-assisted proteomics, enable quantitative proteome comparisons across biological conditions. These five quantitative proteomic methods offer distinct advantages in coverage, throughput, and quantitative reproducibility. Here, we treated them as orthogonal approaches, retaining protein candidates with significant, consistent-direction changes supported across multiple independently instrumented methods to identify high-confidence protein-level changes associated with longevity. Insulin/insulin-like growth factor signaling (IIS) is a highly conserved longevity regulatory pathway from Caenorhabditis elegans to humans. By quantitatively profiling IIS mutants in C. elegans and performing genetic screening, we obtained a systems-view of proteomic changes linked to longevity and identified new longevity regulators. This systematic cross-method comparison also serves as a valuable resource for guiding the selection of quantitative proteomics approaches.

Read it on PubMed ↗

Ding L, Lin H, Huang C et al. Comparative Proteomic Quantification Reveals Novel Longevity Regulators. Proteomics. 2026. doi:10.1002/pmic.70195. PMID: 42878115. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/42878115/

Report a problem