Saturday, October 17, 2026 · Edition updated 6:00 AM ETSAT, OCT 17 · 6 AM ET editionNext edition in Next --:--:--

A trial comparing two types of strength training machines in adults aged 30 to 65

Recruiting · University of Graz

What this means

This study will compare BioStrength machines with regular gym machines over 12 weeks. It has not reported results yet, so we do not know how they compare.

Plain-English summary written by an AI model from the registry listing.

Status
Recruiting
Who can join
Ages 30–65
Where
1 site

Contacts and how to join ↗

The science

Registered title
Effect of BioStrength Training on Muscle Strength and Satisfaction in Adults Aged 30-65
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
interventional
Conditions
Muscle Strength, Body Composition, Physical Fitness
What is tested
BioStrength Intervention, Conventional training
Sponsor
University of Graz
Ages
30 Years to 65 Years
Dates
First posted Dec 11, 2024 · updated Dec 11, 2024

Registry summary

This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of Technogyms BioStrength equipment compared to traditional strength training equipment over a 12-week intervention period. The study will determine whether BioStrength machines produce more effective results in terms of muscle strength and body composition. Participants will be allocated to either the BioStrength group or the traditional training group using a minimisation technique to balance important prognostic factors such as handgrip strength, age and gender between the groups. Key measurements include maximum strength tests (10RM) for leg press and chest press, handgrip strength using a dynamometer, and body composition using bioimpedance analysis. Circumference measurements will also be taken. The study will assess whether BioStrength equipment provides superior results in muscle strength, body composition and training efficiency compared to conventional gym equipment.

Sites (1)

  • CF Leibnitz, Leibnitz, Styria, Styria, Austria

Related treatments

Exercise

Report a problem