What this means
This study has not started recruiting people yet, and no results exist. It will compare a virtual reality exercise program with a traditional physiotherapy program. It cannot tell us which works better until it is done.
Plain-English summary written by an AI model from the registry listing.
- Status
- Opening soon
- Who can join
- Ages 40 and over
- Where
- Not listed
The science
- Registered title
- Virtual Reality-Based vs Traditional Physiotherapy for Balance, Frailty, and Fall Prevention in Adults Aged 45 Years and Older
- Trial ID
- NCT07322861 ↗
- Phase
- Not applicable
- Study type
- interventional
- Conditions
- Frailty, Falls, Balance Deficits, Mobility Limitations
- What is tested
- Virtual Reality-Based Training Program, Physiotherapy Exercise Program
- Sponsor
- Umm Al-Qura University
- Ages
- 40 Years to no maximum
- Dates
- First posted Jan 7, 2026 · updated Jan 7, 2026
Registry summary
This study will compare two exercise-based rehabilitation programs to improve balance and reduce fall risk in adults aged 45 years and older who have had at least one fall in the past year or have balance problems. Participants will be assigned to one of two groups: (1) a virtual reality (VR) exercise program using the PABLO system, or (2) a traditional physiotherapy program based on the Otago approach. Both programs will include balance training, strength/power exercises, aerobic activity, and flexibility. The program will last 12 weeks, with two supervised sessions per week (about 30 minutes each). Assessments will be completed at the start of the study and again after 12 weeks. The main outcomes include frailty status, number of falls, mobility (Timed Up and Go test), and balance (Berg Balance Scale). Additional outcomes include grip strength, quality of life (SF-12), and program adherence and safety. The study will help determine whether VR-based rehabilitation improves participation and outcomes compared with traditional physiotherapy.