What this means
This study will test two teaching methods for a health record app. One group gets one-on-one tutoring, and the other learns on their own with AI-made materials. It has not reported results yet, so we do not know which works better.
Plain-English summary written by an AI model from the registry listing.
- Status
- Recruiting
- Who can join
- Ages 50 and over
- Where
- 2 sites
The science
- Registered title
- Effectiveness of Intensive Tutoring vs. Flexible Self-Learning on Digital Health Literacy and Self-Efficacy for "My Health Bank" App Use Among Adults Over 50
- Trial ID
- NCT07515495 ↗
- Phase
- Not applicable
- Study type
- interventional
- Conditions
- Digital Health Literacy, Healthy Aging
- What is tested
- AI-Collaborative eHealth Education
- Sponsor
- Tri-Service General Hospital (TSGH)
- Ages
- 50 Years to no maximum
- Dates
- First posted Apr 7, 2026 · updated Apr 13, 2026
Registry summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of two different educational models in improving the use of the "My Health Bank" App (a Personal Health Record system in Taiwan) among adults aged 50 and older. As Taiwan's population ages, digital health management has become essential, yet older adults often face a "digital divide." Participants will be randomly assigned to either a "Intensive Guided Learning group" (receiving one-on-one human instruction) or a "Flexible Self-study group" (using self-learning materials co-created with Generative AI). The study aims to compare the outcomes of these two groups in terms of enhancing digital health literacy, self-efficacy, and actual App usage behavior to identify more effective and scalable digital health education strategies.
Sites (2)
- Anle District Health Center and Affiliated Community Centers, Keelung, Anle District, Taiwan
- Tri-Service General Hospital, Department of Orthopaedics, Taipei, Neihu District, Taiwan